Property Portfolio Overview

June 30, 2010
Industrial Properties Year
Con-
structed
(*2)
Number
of
Lessees
(*3)
Leasable
Area(m2)
(*4)
Acquisition
Price
(in millions)
Percentage of Total Portfolio in Acquisition Price(%) Appraisal Value
(in millions)
(*5)
Property name /
Location
(city/ward, prefecture)
(*1)
 
L-1
IIF SHINONOME
Logistics Center

Koto Ward, Tokyo
(*6)
2006. 2 1 27,493.29 13,700 14.3 14,000
L-4
IIF NODA
Logistics Center

Noda, Chiba
2006. 3 2 38,828.10 6,500 6.8 6,560
L-5
IIF SHINSUNA
Logistics Center

Koto Ward, Tokyo
1998. 6 1 5,741.75 5,300 5.5 5,720
L-6
IIF ATSUGI
Logistics Center

Atsugi, Kanagawa
2005. 1 1 10,959.68 2,100 2.2 2,140
L-7
IIF KOSHIGAYA
Logistics Center

Koshigaya, Saitama
1985. 9 1 10,113.50 2,000 2.1 2,100
L-8
IIF NISHINOMIYA
Logistics Center

Nishinomiya, Hyogo
1997. 5 1 10,608.00 1,300 1.4 1,430
L-9
IIF NARASHINO
Logistics Center
(Land with leasehold interest)

Narashino, Chiba
- 1 19,834.71 1,190 1.2 1,940
F-1
IIF TOTSUKA
Technology Center
(Land with leasehold interest)

Yokohama, Kanagawa
- 1 31,442.47 4,500 4.7 4,750
 
Industrial Subtotal 155,021.50 36,590 38.2 38,640
Infrastructure Properties Year
Con-
structed
(*2)
Number
of
Lessees
(*3)
Leasable
Area(m2)
(*4)
Acquisition
Price
(in millions)
Percentage of Total Portfolio in Acquisition Price(%) Appraisal Value
(in millions)
(*5)
Property name /
Location
(city/ward, prefecture)
(*1)
 
I-1
IIF KOBE
District Heating
and Cooling Center

Kobe, Hyogo
1990 .4 1 11,189.36 18,100 18.9 16,000
I-2
IIF HANEDA
Airport
Maintenance Center

Ota Ward, Tokyo
1993 .6 1 81,995.81 41,110 42.9 38,300
 
Infrastructure Subtotal 93,185.17 59,210 61.8 54,300
 
Total 248,206.67 95,800 100.0 92,940
(*1) The prefix indicates the property category(L for logistics facilities, F for factory, research and development facilities and I for infrastructure facilities).
Each category is numbered in order of acquisition.
(*2) As described in the property register.
(*3) The "Number of Lessees" refers to the total number of lessees associated with each property in our portfolio.
(*4) Leasable area as described in the relevant lease agreements.
(*5) Appraisals are as of June 30, 2010.
(*6) IIF calculated the appraisal value by taking 53% (the percentage of its joint trust beneficiary interest) of the total,as described in relevant lease agreements and, in the case of the leasable areas, by rounding to the nearest hundredth of a square meter.
PAGE TOP