Property Portfolio Overview

June 30, 2008
Industrial Properties Year
Con-
structed
(*2)
Number
of
Lessees
Leasable
Area(m2)
(*4)
Acquisition
Price
(in millions)
Percentage of Total Portfolio in Acquisition Price(%) Appraisal Value
(in millions)
(*3)
Property name /
Location
(city/ward, prefecture)
(*1)
 
L-1
IIF SHINONOME
Logistics Center

Koto Ward, Tokyo
2006. 2 1 27,493.29
(*5)
13,700 12.8 15,300
(*5)
L-2
IIF MUSASHI-
MURAYAMA
Logistics Center

Musashimurayama, Tokyo
2003. 7 1 40,884.25 8,000 7.5 8,740
L-3
IIF FUNABASHI
Logistics Center

Funabashi, Chiba
2007. 7 2 42,336.00 9,000 8.4 10,500
L-4
IIF NODA
Logistics Center

Noda, Chiba
2006. 3 2 38,828.10 6,500 6.1 7,240
L-5
IIF SHINSUNA
Logistics Center

Koto Ward, Tokyo
1998. 6 1 5,741.75 5,300 4.9 5,870
L-6
IIF ATSUGI
Logistics Center

Atsugi, Kanagawa
2005. 1 1 10,959.68 2,100 2.0 2,350
L-7
IIF KOSHIGAYA
Logistics Center

Koshigaya, Saitama
1985. 9 1 10,113.50 2,000 1.9 2,270
L-8
IIF NISHINOMIYA
Logistics Center

Nishinomiya, Hyogo
1997. 5 1 10,608.00 1,300 1.2 1,560
 
Industrial Subtotal 186,964.57 47,900 44.7 53,830
Infrastructure Properties Year
Con-
structed
(*2)
Number
of
Lessees
Leasable
Area(m2)
(*4)
Acquisition
Price
(in millions)
Percentage of Total Portfolio in Acquisition Price(%) Appraisal Value
(in millions)
(*3)
Property name /
Location
(city/ward, prefecture)
(*1)
 
I-1
IIF KOBE
District Heating
and Cooling Center

Kobe, Hyogo
1990 .4 1 11,189.36 18,100 16.9 18,000
I-2
IIF HANEDA
Airport
Maintenace Center

Ota Ward, Tokyo
1993 .6 1 81,995.81 41,110 38.4 41,500
 
Infrastructure Subtotal 93,185.17 59,210 55.3 59,500
 
Total 280,149.74 107,110 100.0 113,330
(*1) The prefix indicates the property category(L for logistics facilities and I for infrastructure facilities).
Each category is numbered in order of acquisition.
(*2) As described in the property register.
(*3) Appraisals are as of June 30, 2008.
(*4) Leasable area as described in the relevant lease agreements.
(*5) IIF calculated the leasable area by taking 53% (the percentage of its joint trust beneficiary interest) of the total,as described in relevant lease agreements and, in the case of the leasable areas, by rounding to the nearest hundredth of a square meter.
PAGE TOP